Qt/C++ - Tutorial 079. foreach vs range-based for in C++11?

Qt, foreach, for

Qt has its own keyword foreach to iterate through the elements of the containers. This keyword was introduced before the C++11 standard and is a macro. At this point in the C++11 standard, there are range-based for loops that perform the same functionality as foreach .

But in both cases there are nuances. Let's figure it out.

To which objects can be applied

foreach and range-based for work with containers that have an iterator. In this case there are no differences. They can only be applied to objects with an iterator.

Using, program code

Let's look at the program code. Suppose we have a container

QList<QString> strings;

And we want to do something with the elements of this container, then the record for foreach will look like this

foreach (QString& str, strings)
    // ToDo something

and for range-based for the record will be the next

for (QString& str : strings)
    // ToDo something


The keyword foreach is a macro, which in the end will be equivalent to this record

for (QList<QString>::iterator it = strings.begin(); it != strings.end(); ++it) 
    QString &str = *it;
    // ваш код

But since this is a macro, we get an overhead by compilation time for processing the files by the preprocessor, which will deploy all these macros to the working code.

Speed of work

foreach runs slower range-based for loops because it performs a pre-copy of the container, as described in the Qt documentation. From the copying follows the following nuance, that if during the foreach operation you do something with the container, then this will not have an effect on the elements in the loop. In this case, implicit copying is carried out also when you do not modify the elements of the container.

This code behavior can be quite costly for STL containers, which are expensive to copy. Therefore, for this reason, it's better to use range-based for loops from the C++11 standard.

Disadvantages of range-based for

If you read the Qt documentation, you can find that they recommend still using foreach for Qt containers, and for all others (STL, Boost, etc.) use range-based for loops. This is motivated by the fact that a container with shared data during the operation of a range-based for loop can be detached from these shared data and not returned to its original state after the actions are performed, as a result of which data corruption can occur.

One such implicitly shared class is QPen, which uses deep copying when detach.

void QPen::setStyle(Qt::PenStyle style)
    detach();           // detach from common data
    d->style = style;   // set the style member

void QPen::detach()
    if (d->ref != 1) {
        ...             // perform a deep copy


In my practice, I did not encounter such problems when using range-based for loops for Qt containers, I think, perhaps this is due to the fact that you did not have to often use such loops for containers with QPen objects or other Qt classes requiring separation from shared data.

In fact, recently the use of STL containers seems to me more convenient than the Qt containers in connection with the use of functors (lambd) for searching (std:; find, std :: find_if algorithms, etc.) of specific objects in the container, instead of the usual cycle with a condition in it.

I also adhere to the point of view that it is better to use language constructs instead of MACROS. Just need to consider that there may be problems, due to the peculiarities of containers and other Qt classes.

And the final solution for using foreach vs range-based for is left to your opinion.

10% refund of hotel reservation amount on Booking
10% refund of hotel reservation amount on Booking
We offer a link with a 10% return on the amount of the order when booking a hotel through Booking
Support the author Donate


Only authorized users can post comments.
Please, Log in or Sign up
Looking for a Job?
14,000.00 руб. - 40,000.00 руб.
Разработчик Qt
Annino, Moscow Oblast, Russia
5,000.00 руб. - 15,000.00 руб.
Moskovskiy, Moscow, Russia
25,000.00 руб. - 30,000.00 руб.
Разработчик Qt/C++
Barnaul, Altai Krai, Russia

For registered users on the site there is a minimum amount of advertising

Aug. 22, 2019, 11:24 p.m.

Qt - Test 001. Signals and slots

  • Result:47points,
  • Rating points-6
Aug. 21, 2019, 10:23 a.m.
Andrej Ermoshin

C++ - Test 002. Constants

  • Result:58points,
  • Rating points-2
Aug. 21, 2019, 10:15 a.m.
Andrej Ermoshin

C++ - Test 001. The first program and data types

  • Result:86points,
  • Rating points6
Last comments
Aug. 19, 2019, 7:41 a.m.
Andrej Jankovich

это проблема дистрибутива, попробуйте установить через пакетный менеджер snap Суть проблемы: libQt5Core которая лежит в дистрибутиве требует версию glibc >= 2.25 у вас видимо …
Aug. 18, 2019, 6:09 a.m.

cqtdeployer /home/aleks/CQtDeployer/bin/cqtdeployer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by /home/aleks/CQtDeployer/lib/libQt5Core.so.5) linux mint …
Aug. 17, 2019, 9:04 a.m.

github ChekableTView Правой групповая смена значения при перетаскивании левой как обычно.
Aug. 16, 2019, 1:03 p.m.
Evgenij Legotskoj

Потому, что в минуте 60 секунд
Aug. 16, 2019, 12:16 p.m.

а почему делитель 60000, а не 1000?
Now discuss on the forum
Aug. 24, 2019, 7:21 a.m.
Evgenij Legotskoj

Не помню, давно уже с QML не работал, по-моему, обычно пишет в консоль, что не находит файл. В любом случае какую-то ошибку в консоль выкидывает. Но если честно, если у вас проект будет ак…
Aug. 24, 2019, 4:27 a.m.
Brjus Gliff

Спасибо, вначале в документации было не понятно что к чему, теперь разобрался
Aug. 21, 2019, 8:36 a.m.

Александр, мне не нужно перебирать. Вы говорите правильно, сначала я написал избыточный код просто не подумав. Задача такая, мне нужно просто переложить из QMap в атрибуты xml тега все, что там …
Aug. 21, 2019, 3:16 a.m.

Если Вы разрабатываете какую-то универсальную утилиту, которая вообще не привязана к логике, тогда как вариант: 1. Получить список таблиц через QSqlDatabase::tables 2. Для каждой табли…
© EVILEG 2015-2019
Recommend hosting TIMEWEB